Blog
Ready to shame Lugard?

I just read this excerpt from a book written by Lord Frederick John Dealty Lugard. He is a former colonial master and a dormitory at Achimota School – Lugard House – is named after him.

“In character and temperament, the typical African of this race-type is a happy, thriftless, excitable person. Lacking in self-control, discipline and foresight. Naturally courageous, and naturally courteous and polite, full of personal vanity, with little sense of veracity, fond of music and loving weapons as an oriental loves jewellery. His thoughts are concentrated on the events and feelings of the moment and he suffers little from the apprehension for the future, or grief for the past. His mind is far nearer to the animal world than that of the European or Asiatic, and exhibits something of the animals’ placidity and want of desire to rise beyond the State he has reached. Through the ages the African appears to have evolved no organised religious creed, and though some tribes appear to believe in a deity, the religious sense seldom rises above pantheistic animalism and seems more often to take the form of a vague dread of the supernatural"

“He lacks the power of organisation, and is conspicuously deficient in the management and control alike of men or business. He loves the display of power, but fails to realize its responsibility... he will work hard with a less incentive than most races. He has the courage of the fighting animal, an instinct rather than a moral virtue... In brief, the virtues and defects of this race-type are those of attractive children, whose confidence when it is won is given ungrudgingly as to an older and wiser superior and without envy...Perhaps the two traits which have impressed me as those most characteristic of the African native are his lack of apprehension and his lack of ability to visualise the future. – Lord Frederick John Dealtry Lugard, The Dual Mandate, pg.70 (1926)

Lord Lugard sounds very insulting, doesn't he? The fact, though, is that he is dead right on almost all counts. I know most Africans will disagree with him. And that’s quite understandable.

But then, I think Lord Lugard laughs at us every day from his grave. I am sure most of us may want to prove him wrong. We can’t however do that by force of argument. We must begin to act and act differently from the African he describes. That’s the African of 1926.

Can the African of the 21st Century put Lugard to shame? Maybe. Hopefully, it happens in my lifetime so that when I die, I’d be bold enough to poke fun at Lord Lugard and pull on that moustache of his.

Share on Facebook    RSS Feed   Email To A Friend   Post a Comment
Comments
1. Koo Boateng
  02 Feb 2010 | 11:15 PM
  Ato,
A sharp tongue is no indication of a keen mind. I’m surprised that this half-wit once tricked our forefathers to adore him and to have honored him at one of our great institutions. Truth be told, most of the colonial masters were classless in their home countries and he may have been one of them.

If ignorance is bliss, Lugard must be orgasmic. He must have eaten paint chips when he was a kid.

If the book is credible, I can say that Lugard made a distasteful and unfortunate generalization. The characters he was referring to abound in the so called European and Asiatic societies. Matter of fact, they exist in every society. Too bad his stupidity is so painful. What about the great leaders and business visionaries like Paa Grant who lived during his sojourn in Ghana?
 
2. Mambo
  02 Feb 2010 | 11:25 PM
  Ato! Lord Lugard is true in every respect. Every description he gave is the exact truth. All the people around me behave no different from the description he gave about the African. It is unfortunate you will not be able to see the situation changed now or even during the lifetime of your first born (anyway when will your wife deliver the first child?). We need a miracle to change the African. Ato, please what do you suggest should be done to reverse/halt Lord Lugards observations?
 
3. Bobby
  02 Feb 2010 | 11:36 PM
  Omg, the truth hit me like a bullet.I need to change my ways and think at least like Lugard's descendants
 
4. Coffie
  03 Feb 2010 | 12:30 AM
  Ato, the book might be interesting, can get a copy please..?
 
5. Betty Boop
  03 Feb 2010 | 01:10 AM
  OH MY GOODNESS!!! in my anthropology class in college, we are just reading Lord Lugard and talking about the present-day implications of what his policies were in the colonial times! And how hypocritical his writings were! Wow!
 
6. Bernard, IL
  03 Feb 2010 | 01:25 AM
  Sounded like I was reading from a typical demagogue with interpositions dripping from the old-fagot of a British.
 
7. ototosnero
  03 Feb 2010 | 07:38 AM
  a witty saying proves nothing.
 
8. Odopower,DC
  03 Feb 2010 | 07:58 AM
  Ato, i think Lord Luguard can write us off and generalise about africans but we as a continent must prove him wrong with our deeds and changes about the way we handle our issues. Not when presidents want to be life presidents and die on the seat. Always changing constitutional terms to enable them still hold on to power.
 
9. Adowa
  03 Feb 2010 | 08:04 AM
  The guy is right in most cases. But that is characteristic of most traditional societies. The african however goes a notch higher in being recklessly not forward looking. We are afraid of our skins. All that it takes is for any moron to put a little fear in us and he rules us forever. Only few tribes fiercely resisted colonial invasion. The rest succumbed and went ahead to fight on the side of the West against their own.
 
10. Emmanuel ROCKY
  03 Feb 2010 | 08:20 AM
  Ato, these statement were a true reflection and relevant in the past, but to day African race such a write-up will fall flat in the face and fail to fly even below the rader line. However let's not behave liek ostrich,some of these statement still exist in isolated parts of the continent like, Swaziland, Zimbabwe, Nigeria, Somalia. Just take a reflection of the write-up and match it as against each country of the African continent on case by case. God bless ghana.
 
11. Alickdom
  03 Feb 2010 | 08:27 AM
  Lugard is simply describing an ape. No more, no less.
 
12. Koku
  03 Feb 2010 | 09:13 AM
  Koo Boateng dont be myopic minded. Raise up. This really describe African Leaders of today, but dont let us forget that, this book was written in 1926 and as of today 2010 africans are still the same. This is the part i really agree with him "LOVE THE DISLPAY OF POWER BUT FAILS TO REALIZE ITS RESPONSIBILITY
 
13. Kay
  03 Feb 2010 | 09:41 AM
  what an excellent carefully analysed and written piece by Lugard ?!
Mind you not many in his race have a sense of the future but that very few manage to visualise the future and change it in a way that reflects the entire race. Our vision 50 years ago is what we live in today. Where are those who think this man is stupid ? Opinion about Africans now have changed because the few who can positively visualise the future are reflecting a better future than we did in 1926.
 
14. me
  03 Feb 2010 | 09:51 AM
  Lord Lugard's keen observations are very true! Otherwise, how would we explain the fact that the lady who used to sell roasted plantain to us as children is today still selling at the same spot, with the same 'equipment'... or even less!... no expansion, nothing!... how else can we explain spending in excess of $20million to celebrate our independence while we still sleep in darkness because cannot take care of our energy needs?

Instead of discounting Lord Lugard's views, we must improve ourselves in order to 'shame' him, as Ato rightly puts it.
 
15. Afua
  03 Feb 2010 | 10:50 AM
  Lugard comments are prejudiced and refer to a class type which can be found amongst people of all races all over the world.

Those who agree with Lugard is lacking in self belief and understanding of their own.

They have been made to believe in the inferiority of their own and has decided to prove 'them' wrong. A man of self belief has nothing to prove.

Especially if you have a profound and deep understanding of history ..both European and African and the dynamics that resulted in our present predicament.

Moreover Lugard was making these comments in the capacity as an occupier/coloniser and most of the 'Africans' he came into contact with were the colonized…from a position of power. A lot of our 'educated' brothers and sisters still have a colonized mind. They follow the concept of 'negritude' i.e. attempting to prove to the European that they have a culture and are as good as them. I reject this philosophy of thought and engagement.

We have been made to think our people are primitive because they speak their language and even the so called educated people believe this themselves ..it's a shame because they make up the 'intellectual' majority.

 
16. Wascarat
  03 Feb 2010 | 01:31 PM
  His intend is derogatory but what he says is, sadly, is the pure truth!
A true reflection of our mindset and leadership across the continent.
His observation is over 80 years and there hasn't been any real changes.
What a shame...
 
17. KKA
  03 Feb 2010 | 03:06 PM
  Well I read this with a tinge of sadness. I live in the UK and I guess I could write very derogatory things about the European. The problem I have and have always said about the African or the Ghanaian is the lack of confidence and insatiable need to see and convince ourselves as inferior. I am not sure how to tackle these views espressed in this book. First we could see people who still live in Amazon jungle as inferior on the other hand we could see them as having the right to determine to live in sync with nature. If you read english history all these things we complain about seem to have happened to them. I do not neccesarily see the ability to use deception to dominate another man as the true test of character. Neither do I see denegrading another people's culture as a sign of character. To explain what I mean. If a polititian lies to get to power and steals to get rich to guarantee the future of his children would we consider him the best politician? If we do then I will throw in the towel and agree that Lugard's view are right.
 
18. HeLary
  03 Feb 2010 | 03:09 PM
  Fact is, truth is unpalatable and hurts too. Jesus' description of the attitude of the religious leaders of his day was met with fierce anger. Centuries later, we are still seeing the same things among the clergy. I though Lugard wrote this just hours ago. Sorry I never heard of the guy till now.
 
19. Carlo
  03 Feb 2010 | 04:35 PM
  This racist colonial idiot is basically insinuating that Africans are sub-human and I have to bluntly say that anyone who agrees with his views just based on a couple of points that they can identify with must be a total idiot themselves.
 
20. HeLary
  03 Feb 2010 | 06:39 PM
  @ Carlo. You have just proved Lugard right where he says ''lacking in self-control''
 
21. KKA
  03 Feb 2010 | 07:11 PM
  @HeLary 20 I take it you are white and that you have absolute self control.... OR.
 
22. Helary
  03 Feb 2010 | 07:52 PM
  @KKA. No I am an african, fully aware of my flaws. I just couldnt restrain myself from commenting about Carlos' display of intolerance for the opinions of others.
 
23. Ekua A
  04 Feb 2010 | 05:43 AM
  Ato,

It is with a heavy heart that I read and actually admit that to a about 75% Lugard is right.I don't agree with him though on the aspect of religion.

I have had to ask myself, if Lugard was to resurrect today 2010, will he say his views of the African in 1926 were wrong, or that the Ghanaian of 1926 is not the Ghanaian of 2010?

But I strongly belive that we will change, it will have to begin with each and everyone of us who is saying the Lugard is wrong or who thinks he is actually right.

If you and I, and each person who has contributed to this issue decides to be the change he/she wishes to see, in a year or may be the next decade, we all will be like the small piece of hot charcoal that as a kid I was sent to pick from the coal pot of a neighbour to light my own and from which my neighbour will also light hers; we would have lit up the whole nation from our own little coal pot.

Let each of us be the change we wish to see and lets with one passion, light up our motherland.

God bless our homeland Ghana and continue to make her great and strong
 
24. Nii, Kbu
  04 Feb 2010 | 06:30 AM
  Why do most people seem annoyed by Lugard's comments? Over 70 years down the line and the comments are still spot on. Africa, we must change!!!
 
25. simint, dansoman
  04 Feb 2010 | 07:28 AM
  Lugard was and is still right
He had and still has insight
Take it not from him
He wits were not dim
Oh how I love this man
Whose ideas we cannot ban
For they are relevant today
To keep our politicians at bay
But will they?


 
26. simint, dansoman
  04 Feb 2010 | 07:29 AM
  Lugard was and is still right
He had and still has insight
What Lugard said:
Take it not from him
He wits were not dim
Oh how I love this man
Whose ideas we cannot ban
For they are relevant today
To keep our politicians at bay
But will they?


 
27. simint, dansoman
  04 Feb 2010 | 07:30 AM
  Lugard was and is still right
He had and still has insight
What Lugard said
Take it not from him
He wits were not dim
Oh how I love this man
Whose ideas we cannot ban
For they are relevant today
To keep our politicians at bay
But will they?


 
28. Roland Chudhoxhia
  04 Feb 2010 | 07:35 AM
  The man is dead right. Just take him word for word , look at us everyday, we just do that, we exhibit his words, don't we?. We are his characters in a drama, aren't we? And he is the director on the floor, and the rest of the world are but viewers who pay to watch, in this case they marveled at the words from his book. Haha what a painful truth, look at your politricians from A to Z past and near. Our passion is charged when it is politics, I wonder everyday. Listen to radio call in programs, We are just as he says, Oh yes we are, I wish we can change but that has for a long time eluded us like pool of water on a high.Come to think of it, do you know what determines the African success? aha, I know you don't; buy a car and build a house-- What a successful, you are, damn the rest.
 
29. kuki4mi Antwerp, Belgium
  04 Feb 2010 | 09:07 AM
  Lord Lugard may be right in some of his assersions about the African even till today "Loving the display of power, but failing to realize its responsibility" but I beg to disagree with you that Lord Lugard would be laughing at us in his grave today.

I think what Lord Lugard would do (the gentleman that he is) is that he would revise his book and come out with a better observation of the African race. I think he would in his new edition agree that the bahaviour of the African he saw in 1926 was not as a result of his make up as he tries to put it but that it is a result of lack of civilisation, exposure and education at that point time.

Post 1926 events involving Africans would attest to this. The likes of Nkrumah, Nelson Mandela, Mo Ibrahim, Kofi Annan and many other Africans across the world including even you Ato have shown that the African has the power of organisation, and is not conspicuously deficient in the management and control alike of men or business. Does not lacking in self-control, discipline and foresight.

The problem is that there are many African today do who cannot rise up to the occassion to propagate the achievements of the African. We rather tend to glorify accession of the likes of Lord lugard of 1926 who definately was judging from the white suprimasist point of view.

What we should be doing as African today is to boost the confidence of our people for greater achievements by countering some of these negative perceptions with positive ones and not to engave in the revival of such that have worked against us over the years.

That is a huge task for you Ato.
Good day.
 
30. Bruno
  04 Feb 2010 | 09:25 AM
  This is excellent and Ato it tells me that you are now making some research and getting broad minded. It is a pity but any honest man will agree with Lord Luggard. he is dead right on every score and though some may say it is racist they should check deep within themselves and ask since 1926 what have we collectively been able to achieve. yes there are occasionally flashes of brilliance, Nkurumah, Mandella, Kofi Annan, but then taken as a whole we Afreicans fit the bill.

Teh chellange is for our leaders ( which unfortunatly we do not have any) to help us out of this sespit. The best descritipion is "His thoughts are concentrated on the events and feelings of the moment and he suffers little from the apprehension for the future, or grief for the past
 
31. OBAELATU
  04 Feb 2010 | 10:55 AM
  I think Lord Lugard is more than a PROPHET.He should rest in perfect peace.THE BLACK MAN IS NOT RAEDY TO CHANGE.
 
32. ponchar
  04 Feb 2010 | 11:11 AM
  I cannot believe it! If Ato were to be a colonialist (Africans who helped the colonizers), he would easily have package and sold Ghanaians (who vist his site) to the next generation of colonizers (if there is any such thing). I cannot believe that Ato has forced many contributors to his site to form opinions based solely on what he has read and conveniently and selectively put to the public (this is typical of journalists these days). How many have read the whole book? Please, do not believe line, hook and sink every word that is put forth. Until I've read page to page that book published in 1926, I cannot attempt to know the mind of this 17th century Lugard man. Come off it Ghanaians. Let's not allow our education, no matter where we obtained it, be a mockery of human ability - critical thinking. Please be actually educated and not simply knowing how to read and write.
 
33. Eph Raim
  04 Feb 2010 | 11:13 AM
  It is PAINFULLY true. We love power but lack a sense of responsibility. Look at Idi Amin, Wade of Senegal and other LEADERS who represent us. Greedy, thoughtless men! The south african president just can't concentrate on rulership, and all he does is to sleep with women and generate PUBLIC HUE and CRY!
The Europeans and Asians also have their failings. But at least, they can look down on us from where they stand.
 
34. Ahmed Best Sherif
  04 Feb 2010 | 11:45 AM
  Lord Lugard is damn right! a bitter truth and for me, it's better accepting it as it is now and working to shame him than living in a fool's paradise.
 
35. Tina
  04 Feb 2010 | 12:47 PM
  This the simple truth. Look at Ata - Mills: as if Luggard has his sights on him. This man needs to be honoured.
 
36. ato seidu malouda
  04 Feb 2010 | 02:22 PM
  lord lugard is entitled to his opinions, but all those who side with him should not do so blindly... africa will not be built and enriched by slave labour, looting of mines and ancient graves, holding a bible in one hand a gun in another,racial discrimination etc... anyone may take the african for granted but should be wary........mmh!
 
37. ato seidu malouda
  04 Feb 2010 | 02:28 PM
  lord lugard is entitled to his opinions, but all those who side with him should not do so blindly... africa will not be built and enriched by slave labour, looting of mines and ancient graves, holding a bible in one hand a gun in another,racial discrimination etc... anyone may take the african for granted but should be wary........mmh!
 
38. piero
  04 Feb 2010 | 02:30 PM
  As sad as it is, Lugard is much right than wrong. Much of what is in excerpt is but a candid observation of of our folks. The spade aught to called a spade and not a big spoon.

Our Leaders have failed us; that's why our streets are choked with chaos and remain nameless.Our people lack foresight that's why they will hide the truth and pursue selfish ambitions to the detriment of the wider public.

The Great Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah preached a change of attitude. Ato, where is that change? I think it's showing up in people like Baby Ansaba owning up to their misdeeds.

Untill we can stand for the TRUTH, we won't reach where we desire to reach. Let's eschew greed, selfishness, backbiting, pull-him-down and lazyness And live for each other.


But the truth will stand if we let the Law rule. We shouldn't be driven by emotions in derition of the TRUTH. Bench and Bar beware!!!
 
39. ampah
  04 Feb 2010 | 03:02 PM
  what a masterpiece i will do my best to change my world, i hope u will also do your best to change yours. this is the only way we can shame PROPHET Lord Lugard.
 
40. Cobby Amoako Atta
  04 Feb 2010 | 04:10 PM
  From a wide point of view, I think Lugard's perspective was harshly accurate at that time, if not now.
Sadly the truth sometimes hurt but Lugard came from a culture (Western) that was more advanced! We simply didn’t measure up to his expectation. Only now we have been enlightened in that culture to the point that we now believe we are equals!
Let's face it how many Africans were educated back then? Let’s be fair civilization as we know it is WESTERN!
 
41. abassah, bubiashie
  04 Feb 2010 | 04:54 PM
  OMG,,,what a bitter pill to swallow

 
42. jones
  04 Feb 2010 | 09:14 PM
  He is right.
 
43. Prince Mensah
  04 Feb 2010 | 11:57 PM
  Ato, why are you dignifying the words of a prejudiced and pompous racist by quoting them?

Over and over again, people such as Lord Lugard have been proved wrong.

Does he mean that the black intellectuals in Ancient Egypt who influenced Hellenistic culture (which was a precursor to modern European civilization) were savages?

I think Lord Lugard had forgotten, at the time of his analysis, that once upon a time Anglo-Saxons were regarded as barbarians and savages.

No one has the right and precision to define any other person or race. I think the Good Lord was refering to narrow-minded people, like Lugard, when he asked people to check the log in their eyes, rather than talking about specks in other people's eyes.

I have despised this condescending tone in the language of colonial folks and I think it is self-deprecating to us as a people to accept flawed analysis from a flawed person. Ato, please spare us the rehashing of discredited racist reasoning. You are a great columnist. Inspire us. Invoke the best in us. But ignore the ignoble for it does nothing progressive for us.
 
44. CHARLES
  05 Feb 2010 | 12:58 AM
  People may not like it but that's the truth!
 
45. obaa ankomah
  05 Feb 2010 | 03:11 AM
  "We must begin to act and act differently from the African he describes. That’s the African of 1926"...NO!NO!NO!
Ato, That is where you are wrong...there is nothing like an African of 1926...An African is an African is an African...Those who think like Lugard know one thing and believe me, it has nothing to do with being developed, no! infact on the contrary...Lugard was a RACIST!!! And for people like Lugard nothing an African/Black person does can change their thinking...so please if there is anything to be done it's for Achimota School authorities to change the name of that house...You or me and all Africans combined no matter what we do or how well we do it can never get people like Lugard to change the way they see us.
 
46. Adoma
  05 Feb 2010 | 03:42 AM
  Pull on his moustache ?? Love your sense of humor Ato.Unfortunately you may never get to pull on his moustache because we (Africans) continue to prove him right every day ; even 94 years after he penned those words!
 
47. Okukuseku
  05 Feb 2010 | 04:50 AM
  You must understand that in 1926 there were very few literate Africans. As such a majority of the Africans he came into contact with were illiterates. He certainly was confusing class with race. I see the same tendencies exhibited by certain classes of other races.
 
48. OBAELATU
  05 Feb 2010 | 10:12 AM
  Ato,Ato,Ato!!! Hmmmmm,it's hard paaaaaah,hmmmmm!you live in Ghana and pay black stars in Dollars.Lugard is sooooo RIGTH.Clap for him papa papapa paaaaaa!
 
49. DE LATUS
  05 Feb 2010 | 10:15 AM
  Ato we want mooooooooore,keep it up.
 
50. Nkran
  05 Feb 2010 | 11:37 AM
  Check this link out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SkZDQgDULM&feature=related

Most Africans have already forgotten about Rwanda. The Jews won't let anyone sleep over the WWII atrocities.

We continue to have very short memories.

Lugard was looking at things from a class angle. Today a majority of Africa's education is Western styled. That is why I write in English (as a majority do via comments) but the Chinese writes in Chinese to this day. Our forefathers got the wrong end of the stick. They thought the visitor could be trusted but unfortunately via military might they were subdued and generations on have continued to eat humble pie. Pity we didn't have the military might then, for sure would have been a different story.
 
51. kwasib4
  05 Feb 2010 | 03:00 PM
  ato in all this description given by this man i wondered what he was saying.Though some might be true but some are the most insulting description of this blessed race.
 
52. Kwame Mensa-Bonsu
  05 Feb 2010 | 03:20 PM
  I'm laughing so much. The guy was spot on but your options, for the vote, should have included: Both. hahahahahah!
 
53. DonkofiKofi
  05 Feb 2010 | 07:27 PM
  That Lugard dude was an idiot! If u live amongst his people, you'll come to realise they're not so much different from the animal he's discribed. What's with the english man spitting in a handkerchief and putting it back in his pocket? I watched this piece of documentary that questioned if the black man had a lower IQ than other races, based in america by Reggie Omar. In the end, he concluded that, given the same conditions, we're just as dynamic. What we need is positive criticism and not damn right animalisation of a whole race! It's a shame Achimota School still has a whole house named after such an idiot. I'd suggest they take his name off and put it on just the third shank, counting from the left!
 
54. artkaye
  07 Feb 2010 | 11:26 AM
  The truth is bitter. No wonder several commentators are angry. They can say what they want as if they can't see the reality of Luggard's descriptions right under their noses. We are in 2010 and not different from what we were in 1926. True; we have had the Nkrumahs and the Mandelas but in Ghana as well as in South Africa are we any different from what we were in 1926. Perhaps the luxury cars that use dirt roads and are parked in the slums and the numerous PHDs make the difference. Sometimes I am so sad I am African with all the blessings we have.
 
55. SUSUBIRIBI
  07 Feb 2010 | 09:17 PM
  Most of these commentatators seem to think that Lugard was talking about "other" people. Infact, he was talking about each one of you. You all seem to point your fingers to politicians and the like as if he was not talking about you. The guy was simply confusing class with race. You can find such "people" in all races.
 
56. okukuseku
  08 Feb 2010 | 12:47 AM
  Same thinking that got your brothers and sisters enslaved. Same thinking that spawned apartheid in South Africa and segregation and discrimination in America. It is a pity that the "enslaved minds" still find solidariy in such thoughts. I marvel at the self hatred exhibited by some of my brethren.
 
57. allyghee,
  08 Feb 2010 | 08:06 AM
  "His thoughts are concentrated on the events and feelings of the moment and he suffers little from the apprehension for the future" - Very true, that is
 
58. ato seidu malouda
  08 Feb 2010 | 11:17 AM
  lord lugard is entitled to his opinions, but all those who side with him should not do so blindly... africa will not be built and enriched by slave labour, looting of mines and ancient graves, holding a bible in one hand a gun in another,racial discrimination etc... anyone may take the african for granted but should be wary........mmh!
 
59. abusua
  09 Feb 2010 | 09:09 AM
  its sad indeed that the we allow others to describe us... and we accept their description of us: look critically again at the characteristics of the true African and see whether that is not the expected characteristics to live in a harmonious world. and please dont be decieved about his comments about civilization..... according history when they were still wandering in caves we had advanced civilizations in Africa... where there was complex ruling and community structures and systems. Dahomey, Egypt Ashanti etc.. are they saying when they came to Africa they found "children" then who where the people they fought, what kingdoms did the raid... please let us think.... it has taken them years to realize that Africa had an advance system of religion rulership and living and we still allow them to say what they say in their myopic thinking...ah ahh my people..
 
60. Kwaku D
  10 Feb 2010 | 03:56 AM
  Ato, I hope you dug up this piece just to create a bit of controversy online, and you do not truly believe this self-contradicting illogial pretence at scholarship that Lugard wrote. The following gives a bit of insight into Lugard and his mentality.

Lugard's beliefs are very clearly not true: Look back on African history and our current social structures. And even in 1926, Yaa Asantewaa had only recently died in exile in the Seychelles where she was sent after confronting the British. Lugard was clearly being dishonest about his own experience of Africans.

Africans, born and raised in Africa are performing admirably all over the world. According to Lugard, Africans are by nature close to animals, so how can they perform anywhere?

Moreover, there is nothing original about his theories. If you believe Lugard, then I suggest that you do a lot more reading of the race theories that were openly fashionable in those times. For example, black brains were meticulously examined in search of abnormalities that would distinguish them from other races.

These theories placed the black race a notch above aminals in order to justify the slave trade and other barbaric and inhumane acts and exploitation of Blacks.

You see, Lugard was not carrying out a critique of national problems as Ghanaians and indeed as people of every other nation do. He is saying,'these creatures are not really human. I am a superior race, and i deserve to lord it over them'. It seems strange that modern day Ghanaians agree with him.

People who are opressed by poverty or in any other way often hate themselves, and lack confidence. These feelings of course make it impossible to solve their problems. Please note, that is why our Nkrumah made a strong point of 'African personality'. Black pride was also used as an empowering tool in the USA.

And is it not ironic that even in our days some of the formerly enslaved agree with the former slave master. This is the extent of some people's despair and demoralisation, following the routing of our ancestors on the battlefields, and the complicity of local slave traders.

True, we have problems aplenty. True, we need to relentlessly soul search and criticise ourselves in order to improve our lives. But surely, our mentalities have not been debased to such depths of miserable self-loathing that we quote Lugard's delusions for motivation.

 
61. Friendly Fire
  11 Feb 2010 | 12:32 AM
  According to the "poll" about 45% of the respondents say Lugard was a wise man. I bet a majority of those folks have never travelled outside Africa. Imbeciles and apes as described by Lugard, can be found in all cultures.
 
62. Joshua
  12 Feb 2010 | 07:43 AM
  He statement although true can be observed in every society.

I live and work in the UK and can say that his observation is prevalent in quite a number of the UK cities.
 
63. NewsOne
  12 Feb 2010 | 08:22 AM
  RE: Ready To Shame Lugard?

http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=176435

Dear Ato,

Reading through that preposterous post of yours, I didn't know what to think of it or make of your motives. If you simply wanted to insult your own race, why didn’t you just go ahead and do that in your own words? At least it would have been original and I would have had much more respect for you and your opinion and you would look more dignified.

To borrow words from a colonialist who basically regarded you as half human beggars belief. I am ashamed that you, Ato have neither the oratorical aptitude nor descriptive disposition to articulate your own concerns.

Hiding behind Lugard is the worst crime against free speech and creativity. I do take it out on my own people just as friends do take it out on each other and so forth. Whiles it is ok to criticise ourselves and amend our shortcomings; it is unthinkable and defies common logic to use racist bigots like Lugard as point of reference. It is quite amazing that you (Ato) know what Lugard said but not what Dr James Kwegyir Aggrey with the accolade 'Aggrey of Africa' said. Ato, I bet my last dime that people like Lugard would have long eaten back their words after meeting Dr Aggrey. Sadly today, after about ninety years since Dr. Aggrey died, we have an African who sides with Lugard, absurd.

My purpose here is not to analyse whether or not Lugard is right. If people like Ato believe that for themselves, so be it. What I’m interested in saying however is that too much mediocrity has crept into the media today.

Ato should be wary of the fact that he is no ordinary blogger. The level of traffic he attracts to his blog is influenced by the fact that he has the vehicle of JOYFM to promote his views. In light of this, anything he writes or features must be sound. Writing simply because you feel like it or don’t care what people think is ignorance. Ato, I suppose is one such writer. On his blogsite he refers to himself as ‘Ghana’s most irreverent.’ whatever that means?

As one reader of the Lugard article, Amoulanga comments; Ato does not care about what Ghanaians think of his views. He does care about how our reactions to them affect his fame and pocket. As long as he continues to make his money via click-rate dollars from his blog he cares less about the rest.

Oh how we yearn for quality journalism? Ato, get in touch for a dose of grey matter, boy you need it. In the mean time whiles you configure linking up with me, how about the following from Dr. Aggrey as an appetizer?

AGGREY'S EAGLE A certain man went through a forest seeking any bird he might find. He caught a young bird, brought it home, and put it among his fowls and ducks and turkeys, and gave it chicken's food to eat. Five years later, a naturalist came to visit the man, and noticed the bird. He said to the owner; “Look here, this is an eagle, not a chicken.” The man replied “Yes, you may well be right, but I have trained it to be a chicken. It is no longer an eagle; it is a chicken though it is enormous”. Said the naturalist: “No, it is an eagle, it has the heart of an eagle, and I shall make it soar high to the heavens”. The owner comes back with a retort: “No, it is now a chicken, and it will never fly”. They agreed to test it. The naturalist picked up the bird, held it up, and said loudly: “Eagle, thou art an eagle; thou dost belong to the sky and not down here. Stretch out thy wings and fly”, and with that he hurled the bird up. The eagle turned this way and that, and then looking down, saw the chickens eating, and came to join them. The owner said: “I told you it is now a chicken”. “No”, said the naturalist, “This bird is an eagle. I shall come back and prove this to you”. The exercise was repeated three times, with the same result. The bird always came back to feed with the chickens. The naturalist returned yet again, chose a hill, and held the bird aloft, pointing it to the rising sun, and shouted “Eagle! Thou art an eagle; thou dost not belong down here. Thou dost belong to the sky; stretch forth thy wings, and fly!” The eagle looked round, trembled as if new life was filling it, and suddenly it stretched out its wings, and with the screech of an eagle, it mounted higher, and higher, and never returned. It was really an eagle, though it had been kept and tamed as a chicken!

“My people of Africa” Aggrey continued “we were created in the image of God, but men have made us think that we are chickens, and we still think we are, but we are eagles. Stretch forth your wings and fly! Don't be content with food of chickens”.

Credit: Felix Konotey 2007 Ghanaweb.

People like Ato prefer to continue feeding with Mr. Lugard’s chickens.

CIAO!

ISAAC SIMPSON UK; conqueror80@rocketmail.com
 
64. Õnua™
  12 Feb 2010 | 11:07 PM
  You may have been born in the same century with Lugard, Our children including yours will live to see if YOU Ato Kwamina Dadzie & Group of 21st century can make any difference than you arncestors! Africa is a free place, And we'll all welcome your organisational mental power! To lead the Black man, To a promise land!
You have all it takes to shame Mr. Lugard! Ato, good luck!
 
65. Kweku Abeeku
  14 Feb 2010 | 03:25 AM
  Ato is simply a simpleton. He has absolutely no desire for critical thought. Could be a case of poor education or self hate; most likely a combination of both.
 
66. Onua
  14 Feb 2010 | 04:43 PM
  Ato Mr. Lugard was reffering to people like your type, look at way you hate Rawlings, Can you work with him? I don't think so! That's what exactly Lugard was saying. Good luck!
 
67. Idemudia
  17 Mar 2010 | 06:13 AM
 
In my opinion, the greatest havoc the white folks have wreaked on Blacks is the destruction of their (the Blacks´) identity and self-consciousness, isolating them from their glorious past, while simultaneously dehumanizing them, infecting their minds with an inferiority complex! Thus making them amenable, pliable to all forms of atrocities and exploitations.

If only Africans would read THEIR history! The Bloggers, Prince Mensah, Kwaku D., Isaac Simpson (Nrs. 43, 60, 63 respectively) got it right! Black Africans brought light and civilisation to the rest of the world: the arts and sciences, religion, mysticism, philosophy....., everything, at a time, when white folks were savages! But they have forgotten! Or more aptly, MADE to forget, after Black Africa was finally conquered about 2500 years ago.

The Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans! Did Lugard mean the same people, who brought civilisation to his own "race"? Pharaoh Echnaton, a black man, introduced monotheism to the world, 1350/2 B.C.E. Osiris,Isis,Horus were black African deities, revered all over the world, thousands of years before Christianity and Islam.... Yet these
deranged racists and blood-thirsty exploiters would come to Africa and call you pagans and infidels! And you agree!!! Brainwashing...

The perenial tribulations of Africans are the results of the calculated evil machinations of white folks over a such a long period of time, culminating in the barbaric enslavement, colonisation, dehumanization and impoverishment of the African people. And the bad news is, the situation won´t change anytime soon......., because most of the present African rulers are ignorant,willing,
brainwashed tools and collaborators of our enemies.

But there´s hope..... When Africans take the time to study the HISTORY of their glorious past, understand how they fell from grace to grass, how they,in the words of Dr.Aggey, turned from "eagle to chicken", then,
there will be a mass revolution of Black people, which will shake the foundations of this present "world order", thereby reinstating
the Blacks.

A good way to start would be to read the works of Cheikh Anta Diop and like scholars NOW. Start TODAY and spread the news. And I´m sure, pretty soon, the eagle will fly again!

aidumedi@hotmail.com













 
68. HA
  15 Apr 2010 | 07:26 AM
  Unsubstantiated non-empirical nonsensical 'non-science'. Of course the characters he describes do exist in African society from Egypt the cradle of civilisation through Ghana, to South Africa.

To confound his argument though, I have personally seen many more of the person-types he describes in the materialistic, media driven world that the West has become. Perhaps the tables are turning.....
 
69. Phielmarshall Gazza
  15 Apr 2010 | 03:02 PM
  THE MAN HIT THE NAIL RIGHT ON THE HEAD.....HE SAID THIS SOME MANY YEARS AGO BUT WE STILL THE SAME PROBLEMS AND WE ARE STILL HAVE THE SAME MIND FRAME....HE SHOULD BR HONORED
 
70. Kweku
  21 Apr 2010 | 05:31 PM
  I think the claims of Lugard require a more critical dissection than we are probably doing. He may be right as generalizations often turn out to be so perceived. But a line by line analysis, and an aggregation of the points will reveal important chauvinism characteristic of a typical european. my questions are: 1) why did britain conspired with the rest of the west to dismantle all progressive governments in Africa between 1960 and 1970? Why did britain stop the teaching of Nkrumaism in Uganda? Perhaps, answers to these questions will help us see the flip-side of Lugard's African coin. If our understanding is illuminated by our own history, we won't be suffering from the euro-imposed identity crisis that gives a basis for Lugard's unintelligible assertions.
 
71. Everyman
  24 Apr 2010 | 07:37 AM
  From most of what people have said so far, seem to agree with lugard. The sad truth is most of you have been made to believe what has been written about you from the dawn of time by people like lugard.Your history has been told by others, not you. Your story has been told by others, not you. The first book you read or was read to you by your class one teacher was most likely written by someone not of your kind. Start writing your story, your history. I know what to tell my children and it will not be what lugard wrote.
 
  Post a Comment
 
  Name *
  Comment *
You have characters left.
      
Poll
Government is losing court cases because...

The AG is incompetent 31%
The judges are biased 21%
You win some and lose some 48%
Total Votes: 371

The AG is incompetent
The judges are biased
You win some and lose some
Your browser don`t support flash.